Republican Calls Dem’s Dead Son “A Homo”

Vote TYT everyday through 1/15/10 @ streamy.org: tinyurl.com Follow us on Twitter: twitter.com Check Out TYT Interviews www.youtube.com Watch more at www.theyoungturks.com

Related posts:

  1. Republican Busted on Meet the Press
  2. Rep. Grayson Calls Out Fox News & Republican Party
  3. Obama Gets Democrats & Republican To Agree On Hating Healthcare Reform Bill
  4. Republican Pervert Stalker
  5. Republican Busted On Government Handouts

{ 19 comments… read them below or add one }

lredtree February 19, 2010 at 3:30 pm

“Martin Luther”? You mean the founder of the Lutheran religion? I could buy that.

Everything else you said was like alphabet soup.

luvcheney1 February 19, 2010 at 4:07 pm

“King”. It is disjointed, I agree. If you read the post above it, from junkyassmonkey, I was responding point by point to his progressive comments.

lredtree February 19, 2010 at 5:32 pm

I’m assuming you actually mean “King, jr.”.
And I fail to understand what beating hookers has to do with civil rights. I could see it in reference to capitalism, perhaps.

luvcheney1 February 19, 2010 at 9:31 pm

MLK was a fucking scumbag in life. Of course, now he is dead, and his memory is something grand.

luvcheney1 February 20, 2010 at 8:01 am

How about one of you brave Libs who votes negative actually refute a point. Cowards!

luvcheney1 February 20, 2010 at 8:03 am

Yes, the hookers were capitalists, perhaps that is why he beat them.

lredtree February 20, 2010 at 1:39 pm

Prostitution is a product of capitalism. Though, it is amusing to watch you wander around blind.

luvcheney1 February 20, 2010 at 3:08 pm

The oldest profession. When I sold cars for a living, my boss said there was nothing better than selling things for money that didnt belong to you. Prostitution has that beat, you can sell the same thing over and over.

luvcheney1 February 20, 2010 at 3:10 pm

Yes there is. An anus is not the proper place for a penis. By the way, gays can marry, many have for many years.

nevar00 February 20, 2010 at 7:34 pm

Neither is a mouth. Or a female’s anus. Or a vagina for any other reason than to reproduce, for that matter.

luvcheney1 February 20, 2010 at 11:32 pm

A females anus is also the wrong place. A mouth is not a problem, but would depend on the penis, of course. Ear? Nostril?

luvcheney1 February 20, 2010 at 11:34 pm

Of course, we could have a problem if the definition is man and woman. Still, gays can marry. It just has to be a woman. Not a man , dog, cat, etc. No discrimination here.

nevar00 February 21, 2010 at 7:41 am

So how is a mouth not a problem but an anus is? It fits pretty well (not that I’ve ever done it).

Ear and nostril seems kind of gross to me, but if someone else wants to do it, it’s none of my business.

nevar00 February 21, 2010 at 7:42 am

I’m sure that’s a comfort to them. The same argument could’ve been used when inter-racial marriage wasn’t allowed.

luvcheney1 February 21, 2010 at 10:50 am

Thanks, thats the point. Nobody these days is telling guys not to take it in the anus. Thats their business. Defining marriage is the States business. Liberal States, such as Ca, decided a definition of the word marriage. It does not exclude gays from marrying, it defines marriage to be a man and woman. There is an extremely beautiful woman on Fox, Kimberly Guilfoyle, who was married to the gay mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom. Gays are free to marry. Get over it.

nevar00 February 21, 2010 at 11:13 am

Gavin Newsom is not gay, but nice try. And the ‘gays can marry’ bullshit is… well, bullshit. Why would they care if they can marry someone if they aren’t attracted to them?

luvcheney1 February 21, 2010 at 10:29 pm

Could have fooled me. The point is, they are not being discriminated against, they can do the same thing as everybody else, “marry the opposite sex”. Some people think multiple wives is OK, nobody says you cant live with several women, but, its illegal to marry them. We all make our sacrifices. It is just “the definition”.

nevar00 February 22, 2010 at 5:16 am

Well, as I said, the same argument could’ve been used against a black and white who wanted to marry.

But this argument is getting nowhere.

luvcheney1 February 22, 2010 at 7:43 am

If it is someone with a penis, and someone with a vagina, it shouldnt matter, unless one is from a different species, such as as sheep, or a goat.

Leave a Comment

Previous post: Americans Say US Debt Bigger Threat Than Terrorism

Next post: National Labor Relations Board Nominee Blocked In The Senate